This movie is not good at all. It’s a B movie that happened to have well known actors in it. 3022 is unoriginal with a thin plot and cheap looking. Very little imagination went into the making of this movie. This is one of those films that you run across and it has big name actors in it and you wonder why. What made them do this? What were they going through? Did they owe someone a favor? Are they living check to check like everyone else? I thought they had options.
Spoiler Alert Omar Epps is the captain of a spaceship with a crew of four people. The ship gets lost in space. A young crew member dies, the oldest crew member loses his mind, it’s Kate Walsh and Omar Epps for a while. They run across another spaceship that is lost in space. They decide to help those aboard the other spaceship. Unfortunately there are limited supplies and not enough resources including oxygen for everyone to survive and make it back to Earth in the time they project.
A fight for survival ensues. One of the newcomers dies. The other two lose their minds. Those two eventually die. Kate Walsh dies at some point and Omar Epps ends up an old man lost in space by himself which is sad. I thought that the spaceship had limited resources but I guess Omar figured that out.
3022 is not the year that this takes place it is the day of the mission when Omar Epps makes a journal entry as an old man. The movies takes place in the distant future but the movie set looks like an old black and white episode of “Lost in Space” and they used keyboards on the spaceship that look like the exact keyboard I am using right now.
Lost in Space
I guess if you’re a fan of Omar Epps or Kate Walsh you will enjoy this. Miranda Cosgrove is in this as well and she is very cute. You may like it if you enjoy science fiction under any circumstances. But I can’t find a real reason to recommend this movie. It’s pretty corny.
I watched Terminator Dark Fate yesterday and it was OK, just OK. I was a fan of the old Terminator films so I gave this film some grace for being a part of a franchise that I loved long ago. However, I don’t think it stands alone very well.
Linda Hamilton and Arnold Swarzenegger were great in this movie. When I heard about this film’s release I was confused as to how either of them could reprise their roles due to their ages. Both actors are what most of us would consider to be long in the tooth to be an action hero. Hamilton is sixty three and Schwarzenegger is seventy two. But they played their roles as well as they did in their prime. Perhaps they are still in their prime; who am I to say? Edward Furlong wasn’t in Dark Fate if you’re wondering but his character was in the story briefly.
I have always had a problem with movies that transcend time and or dimension. Movies such as The Matrix and Inception always confuse me. I have a difficult time keeping track of what is the reality or a dream and what is the present, the future or the past. Back to the Future worked because there were clear differences between the times that he traveled between.
The plot was pretty typical. A young woman held the fate of all humanity in her hands and she needed to be protected. There was a villain, a Terminator that was trying to kill her in order to change the history of the world. She had to be protected. Chaos and destruction ensues. Meh.
Terminator, Dark Fate took place in the future and then went further into the future. I think. It was hard to keep up with what was going on. In all fairness I have to divulge that I borrowed a DVD of this movie from the library. I had to watch it late at night on a work night and I was drowsy while watching it and dozed off in parts. That might explain why I couldn’t totally follow the plot.
Another problem with this film is that it is extremely loud. I’m glad I watched it at home where I could control the volume. This film must have been overwhelming in theaters. I don’t remember being bothered by the loudness of Terminator 2 that I remember seeing in a theater. But I was much younger then and more tolerant of racket.
This movie could stand to be shorter. There is a loud, non stop action sequence that lasted thirty to forty five minutes. Crazy things happened, such as fights against indestructible, futuristic robots in planes while in flight and a huge door was open. They fought the robot under water for a while. The story took place in Mexico City so I have no idea what body of what they were in. The scenes were wild and the noise was deafening.
The evil robot that was in pursuit of the savior of the world, the late model Terminator, had a clear advantage in that he was nearly indestructible. I mean this guy got shot, bludgeoned, set on fire, put through a turbine of some sort and continued to fight. But he couldn’t take out three mere mortals and one robot that was an old model. That was a huge hole in the plot for me.
If you enjoyed the old Terminator films you may get a kick out of this for the sake of nostalgia. You may also enjoy it if you enjoy raucous action films and special effects. This movie was just OK for me. If it wasn’t a part of a successful franchise that I enjoyed long ago Terminator, Dark Fate wouldn’t hold much merit for me at all.
I watched the film “Harriet” over the weekend. “Harriet” is a dramatized retelling of the life of American hero Harriet Tubman. There was a lot of buzz around this film and a lot of think pieces were written and vlogs were made about this movie. People really over thought this. It was a good movie, not great but good and I think it’s worth watching. However, historic accounts of Harriet Tubman are more thrilling than “Harriet”.
Something about “Harriet” made me feel like I was watching an 80s night time soap opera. Violins played in the background of several scenes. This movie told it’s story in a feminine way. It was a love story of sorts. Harriet escaped to freedom in the north and she returned for love of her husband and other family members.
When I envisioned a film version of Harriet Tubman’s life I thought of her as more of a rebel, freedom fighter and visionary. In my mind Harriet Tubman’s life is more of an action, thriller and suspense story. Harriet was bold, fearless and determined.
The actress that played Harriet Tubman often had a deer in the headlights expression on her face and a furrowed brow. There was also a lot of dainty running in this film. It was the kind of running women do in horror films. Actors also fell as they were being pursued. Harriet Tubman commonly had fainting spells due to a head injury she suffered at her owner’s hand. The spells were depicted in the film and she fell pretty kind of like Scarlet O’Hara. None of this is necessarily bad thing I just think the director’s choices were interesting.
I do believe that “Harriet” sanitized Harriet Tubman for White audiences. She was a gentle character and not a fierce revolutionary. Harriet Tubman is famous for threatening to kill runaway slaves if they lost their nerves and wanted to turn around. She is also famous for saying that she freed (paraphrase) thousands of slaves and could have freed thousands more if they knew they were slaves.
There was a scene in the film where Harriet had her slave master on his knees at gun point. She had the opportunity to shoot him but she talked to him and let him live. I think that this plays into the trope of the all forgiving African American that turns the other cheek regardless of how they were treated.
Nonetheless, the film was entertaining and I would recommend it. But I recommend reading historical accounts of Harriet Tubman. Her acts of bravery were absolutely thrilling and she is one of the greatest American heroines.